Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sony Alpha A6500
Sony Alpha A6500 has the edge on paper, but the right choice depends on what you shoot. The X-T2 is the better pick for landscapes, a film look; the Alpha A6500 is better for travel, vlogging.
Choose the X-T2 for
- more resolution (24.3MP vs 24.2MP)
- a lower price (from £329)
Choose the Alpha A6500 for
- faster bursts (11fps vs 8fps)
- better low-light performance
- a lighter body (453g vs 507g)
- in-body image stabilisation
- more lenses in our database (105 vs 36)
Specs side by side
| Spec | X-T2 | Alpha A6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | APS-C, 24.3MP | APS-C, 24.2MP |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Sony E (APS-C) |
| Released | 2016 | 2016 |
| Burst | 8 fps | 11 fps |
| Readout | — | — |
| Max ISO | 12,800 | 25,600 |
| Stabilisation | Lens only | In-body |
| Video | 4K 30p | 4K 30p |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Weight | 507 g | 453 g |
| Battery | Fujifilm NP-W126S | Sony NP-FW50 |
| Card slots | 2× SD (UHS-II) | SD (UHS-I) |
| New price | No longer sold new | No longer sold new |
| Used at MPB | £329–484 | £369–539 |
| Native lenses in our database | 36 (23 third-party) | 105 (82 third-party) |
Which is better for…
| Use | Better choice |
|---|---|
| Beginner-friendly | About equal |
| Everyday & travel | Alpha A6500 |
| Portraits | About equal |
| Landscape | X-T2 |
| Wildlife & animals | About equal |
| Sports & action | About equal |
| Astrophotography | About equal |
| Vlogging & video | Alpha A6500 |
| Vintage / film look | X-T2 |
Based on the specs that matter most for each type of photography: burst and readout for action, resolution for landscapes, sensor size and low light for portraits and astro, video and weight for vlogging.
Lenses and running costs
The X-T2 uses Fujifilm X (36 lenses in our database, 23 third-party) and the Alpha A6500 uses Sony E / FE (105 lenses, 82 third-party). Batteries: Fujifilm NP-W126S (about £46) vs Sony NP-FW50 (about £55).
X-T2 compatible lenses → · Alpha A6500 compatible lenses → ·
Frequently asked questions
Is the Fujifilm X-T2 better than the Sony Alpha A6500?
It depends on your priorities. The X-T2 offers more resolution (24.3MP vs 24.2MP), a lower price (from £329); the Alpha A6500 offers faster bursts (11fps vs 8fps), better low-light performance, a lighter body (453g vs 507g).
Which is better for video, the X-T2 or the Alpha A6500?
They are closely matched for video (4K 30p vs 4K 30p); stabilisation and lens choice will decide it.
Which is cheaper, the X-T2 or the Alpha A6500?
The X-T2 costs No longer sold new new and from £329 used at MPB; the Alpha A6500 costs No longer sold new new and from £369 used (checked 5 November 2026).
Can I use Fujifilm X-T2 lenses on the Alpha A6500?
Not directly. The X-T2 uses Fujifilm X and the Alpha A6500 uses Sony E / FE; switching usually means new lenses or an adapter where one exists.