Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-T200
Fujifilm X-T200 has the edge on paper, but the right choice depends on what you shoot. The EOS M50 Mark II is the better pick for travel; the X-T200 is better for a film look.
Choose the EOS M50 Mark II for
- faster bursts (10fps vs 8fps)
- a lower price (from £364)
Choose the X-T200 for
- more resolution (24.2MP vs 24.1MP)
- a lighter body (370g vs 387g)
- more lenses in our database (36 vs 9)
Specs side by side
| Spec | EOS M50 Mark II | X-T200 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | APS-C, 24.1MP | APS-C, 24.2MP |
| Mount | Canon EF-M (APS-C) | Fujifilm X |
| Released | 2020 | 2020 |
| Burst | 10 fps | 8 fps |
| Readout | — | — |
| Max ISO | 25,600 | 12,800 |
| Stabilisation | Lens only | Lens only |
| Video | 4K 24p (crop) | 4K 30p |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Weight | 387 g | 370 g |
| Battery | Canon LP-E12 | Fujifilm NP-W126S |
| Card slots | SD (UHS-I) | SD (UHS-I) |
| New price | No longer sold new | No longer sold new |
| Used at MPB | £364–369 | £369 |
| Native lenses in our database | 9 (4 third-party) | 36 (23 third-party) |
Which is better for…
| Use | Better choice |
|---|---|
| Beginner-friendly | About equal |
| Everyday & travel | EOS M50 Mark II |
| Portraits | About equal |
| Landscape | About equal |
| Wildlife & animals | About equal |
| Sports & action | About equal |
| Astrophotography | About equal |
| Vlogging & video | About equal |
| Vintage / film look | X-T200 |
Based on the specs that matter most for each type of photography: burst and readout for action, resolution for landscapes, sensor size and low light for portraits and astro, video and weight for vlogging.
Lenses and running costs
The EOS M50 Mark II uses Canon EF-M (9 lenses in our database, 4 third-party) and the X-T200 uses Fujifilm X (36 lenses, 23 third-party). Batteries: Canon LP-E12 (about £50) vs Fujifilm NP-W126S (about £46).
EOS M50 Mark II compatible lenses → · X-T200 compatible lenses → ·
Frequently asked questions
Is the Canon EOS M50 Mark II better than the Fujifilm X-T200?
It depends on your priorities. The EOS M50 Mark II offers faster bursts (10fps vs 8fps), a lower price (from £364); the X-T200 offers more resolution (24.2MP vs 24.1MP), a lighter body (370g vs 387g), more lenses in our database (36 vs 9).
Which is better for video, the EOS M50 Mark II or the X-T200?
They are closely matched for video (4K 24p (crop) vs 4K 30p); stabilisation and lens choice will decide it.
Which is cheaper, the EOS M50 Mark II or the X-T200?
The EOS M50 Mark II costs No longer sold new new and from £364 used at MPB; the X-T200 costs No longer sold new new and from £369 used (checked 5 November 2026).
Can I use Canon EOS M50 Mark II lenses on the X-T200?
Not directly. The EOS M50 Mark II uses Canon EF-M and the X-T200 uses Fujifilm X; switching usually means new lenses or an adapter where one exists.