Camera comparison · updated 5 November 2026

Sony Alpha A9 II vs Canon EOS R5

Sony Alpha A9 II has the edge on paper, but the right choice depends on what you shoot. The Alpha A9 II is the better pick for wildlife, sports, astrophotography; the EOS R5 is better for portraits, landscapes, vlogging.

Choose the Alpha A9 II for

  • better low-light performance
  • a lighter body (678g vs 738g)
  • a lower price (from £1,189)
  • more lenses in our database (105 vs 36)

Choose the EOS R5 for

  • more resolution (45MP vs 24.2MP)
  • stronger video (8K 30p)
  • a newer design (2020)

Specs side by side

SpecAlpha A9 IIEOS R5
SensorFull frame, 24.2MPFull frame, 45MP
MountSony FE (full frame)Canon RF (full frame)
Released20192020
Burst20 fps20 fps
Readout≈6 ms—
Max ISO51,20051,200
StabilisationIn-bodyIn-body
Video4K 30p8K 30p
Weather sealedYesYes
ViewfinderElectronicElectronic
Weight678 g738 g
BatterySony NP-FZ100Canon LP-E6NH
Card slots2× SD (UHS-II)CFexpress B + SD (UHS-II)
New priceNo longer sold newNo longer sold new
Used at MPB£1,189–1,419£1,239–2,009
Native lenses in our database105 (82 third-party)36 (14 third-party)

Which is better for…

UseBetter choice
Beginner-friendlyAbout equal
Everyday & travelAbout equal
PortraitsEOS R5
LandscapeEOS R5
Wildlife & animalsAlpha A9 II
Sports & actionAlpha A9 II
AstrophotographyAlpha A9 II
Vlogging & videoEOS R5
Vintage / film lookAbout equal

Based on the specs that matter most for each type of photography: burst and readout for action, resolution for landscapes, sensor size and low light for portraits and astro, video and weight for vlogging.

Lenses and running costs

The Alpha A9 II uses Sony E / FE (105 lenses in our database, 82 third-party) and the EOS R5 uses Canon RF / RF-S (36 lenses, 14 third-party). Batteries: Sony NP-FZ100 (about £65) vs Canon LP-E6NH.

Alpha A9 II compatible lenses → · EOS R5 compatible lenses → ·

Frequently asked questions

Is the Sony Alpha A9 II better than the Canon EOS R5?

It depends on your priorities. The Alpha A9 II offers better low-light performance, a lighter body (678g vs 738g), a lower price (from £1,189); the EOS R5 offers more resolution (45MP vs 24.2MP), stronger video (8K 30p), a newer design (2020).

Which is better for video, the Alpha A9 II or the EOS R5?

The EOS R5 is stronger for video: Alpha A9 II records 4K 30p, EOS R5 records 8K 30p.

Which is cheaper, the Alpha A9 II or the EOS R5?

The Alpha A9 II costs No longer sold new new and from £1,189 used at MPB; the EOS R5 costs No longer sold new new and from £1,239 used (checked 5 November 2026).

Can I use Sony Alpha A9 II lenses on the EOS R5?

Not directly. The Alpha A9 II uses Sony E / FE and the EOS R5 uses Canon RF / RF-S; switching usually means new lenses or an adapter where one exists.

Related comparisons