Camera comparison · updated 5 November 2026

Sony Alpha A7R V vs Canon EOS R6 Mark III

Canon EOS R6 Mark III has the edge on paper, but the right choice depends on what you shoot. The Alpha A7R V is the better pick for landscapes; the EOS R6 Mark III is better for wildlife, sports, vlogging.

Choose the Alpha A7R V for

  • more resolution (61MP vs 32.5MP)
  • stronger video (8K 24p)
  • more lenses in our database (105 vs 36)

Choose the EOS R6 Mark III for

  • faster bursts (40fps vs 10fps)
  • a lighter body (699g vs 723g)
  • a lower price (from £1,779)
  • a newer design (2025)

Specs side by side

SpecAlpha A7R VEOS R6 Mark III
SensorFull frame, 61MPFull frame, 32.5MP
MountSony FE (full frame)Canon RF (full frame)
Released20222025
Burst10 fps40 fps
Readout——
Max ISO32,00064,000
StabilisationIn-bodyIn-body
Video8K 24p7K open gate
Weather sealedYesYes
ViewfinderElectronicElectronic
Weight723 g699 g
BatterySony NP-FZ100Canon LP-E6P
Card slots2×CFexpress A/SDCFexpress B + SD (UHS-II)
New price£2,999£2,799
Used at MPB£1,859–2,149£1,779–2,029
Native lenses in our database105 (82 third-party)36 (14 third-party)

Which is better for…

UseBetter choice
Beginner-friendlyAbout equal
Everyday & travelAbout equal
PortraitsAbout equal
LandscapeAlpha A7R V
Wildlife & animalsEOS R6 Mark III
Sports & actionEOS R6 Mark III
AstrophotographyAbout equal
Vlogging & videoEOS R6 Mark III
Vintage / film lookAbout equal

Based on the specs that matter most for each type of photography: burst and readout for action, resolution for landscapes, sensor size and low light for portraits and astro, video and weight for vlogging.

Lenses and running costs

The Alpha A7R V uses Sony E / FE (105 lenses in our database, 82 third-party) and the EOS R6 Mark III uses Canon RF / RF-S (36 lenses, 14 third-party). Batteries: Sony NP-FZ100 (about £65) vs Canon LP-E6P (about £99).

Alpha A7R V compatible lenses → · EOS R6 Mark III compatible lenses → ·

Frequently asked questions

Is the Sony Alpha A7R V better than the Canon EOS R6 Mark III?

It depends on your priorities. The Alpha A7R V offers more resolution (61MP vs 32.5MP), stronger video (8K 24p), more lenses in our database (105 vs 36); the EOS R6 Mark III offers faster bursts (40fps vs 10fps), a lighter body (699g vs 723g), a lower price (from £1,779).

Which is better for video, the Alpha A7R V or the EOS R6 Mark III?

The Alpha A7R V is stronger for video: Alpha A7R V records 8K 24p, EOS R6 Mark III records 7K open gate.

Which is cheaper, the Alpha A7R V or the EOS R6 Mark III?

The Alpha A7R V costs £2,999 new and from £1,859 used at MPB; the EOS R6 Mark III costs £2,799 new and from £1,779 used (checked 5 November 2026).

Can I use Sony Alpha A7R V lenses on the EOS R6 Mark III?

Not directly. The Alpha A7R V uses Sony E / FE and the EOS R6 Mark III uses Canon RF / RF-S; switching usually means new lenses or an adapter where one exists.

Related comparisons