Lens comparison · L-Mount · updated 5 November 2026

Panasonic Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 vs Panasonic Lumix S 24-70mm f/2.8

Verdict

Panasonic Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 has more in its favour on paper. The Lumix S 24-70mm f/2.8 gathers more light for low light and background blur; the Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 is lighter and cheaper.

Choose the Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 for

  • less weight (350g vs 935g)
  • a lower price (about £170 vs £1,260)
  • a wider starting focal length (20mm vs 24mm)

Choose the Lumix S 24-70mm f/2.8 for

  • a brighter maximum aperture (f/2.8, about 0.6 stops more light)
  • more reach (70mm vs 60mm)
  • a constant aperture through the zoom range
Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6Lumix S 24-70mm f/2.8
BrandPanasonicPanasonic
Focal length20-60mm24-70mm
Maximum aperturef/3.5-5.6f/2.8
Weight350 g935 g
StabilisationNoNo
Weather sealingYesYes
Filter size67mm82mm
Made forFull frameFull frame
New price£499£2,099
Used at MPB (L-Mount)£164–£174£1,049–£1,479

More lens comparisons

See all L-Mount cameras and lenses.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Panasonic Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 better than the Panasonic Lumix S 24-70mm f/2.8?

The Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 offers less weight (350g vs 935g), a lower price (about £170 vs £1,260), a wider starting focal length (20mm vs 24mm); the Lumix S 24-70mm f/2.8 offers a brighter maximum aperture (f/2.8, about 0.6 stops more light), more reach (70mm vs 60mm), a constant aperture through the zoom range.

Which is better value, the Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 or the Lumix S 24-70mm f/2.8?

On L-Mount, the Panasonic Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 costs about £170 against about £1,260 for the Panasonic Lumix S 24-70mm f/2.8 (MPB used where listed, otherwise new; checked 5 November 2026).

Is f/2.8 worth it over f/3.5?

f/2.8 gathers about 0.6 stops more light, which helps indoors, at night and for background blur. If you mostly shoot in good light, the slower lens is usually lighter and cheaper.

Do both lenses fit the same cameras?

Both are available for L-Mount.