Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 Macro vs Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art
Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 Macro has more in its favour on paper. The 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art gathers more light for low light and background blur; the Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 Macro is lighter and cheaper.
Choose the Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 Macro for
- less weight (345g vs 795g)
- a lower price (about £530 vs £570)
- more reach (28mm vs 24mm)
Choose the 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art for
- a brighter maximum aperture (f/2.8, about 1.0 stops more light)
- a constant aperture through the zoom range
| Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 Macro | 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Panasonic | Sigma |
| Focal length | 14-28mm | 14-24mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Weight | 345 g | 795 g |
| Stabilisation | No | No |
| Weather sealing | Yes | Yes |
| Filter size | 77mm | — |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| New price | £649 | £1,299 |
| Used at MPB (L-Mount) | £534–£534 | £499–£639 |
More lens comparisons
See all L-Mount cameras and lenses.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 Macro better than the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art?
The Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 Macro offers less weight (345g vs 795g), a lower price (about £530 vs £570), more reach (28mm vs 24mm); the 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art offers a brighter maximum aperture (f/2.8, about 1.0 stops more light), a constant aperture through the zoom range.
Which is better value, the Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 Macro or the 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art?
On L-Mount, the Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 Macro costs about £530 against about £570 for the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art (MPB used where listed, otherwise new; checked 5 November 2026).
Is f/2.8 worth it over f/4?
f/2.8 gathers about 1.0 stops more light, which helps indoors, at night and for background blur. If you mostly shoot in good light, the slower lens is usually lighter and cheaper.
Do both lenses fit the same cameras?
Both are available for L-Mount (and other mounts: Sony E / FE).